Innumerable as the Starrs of Night,
Or Starrs of Morning, Dew-drops, which the Sun Impearls on every leaf and every flouer Milton |
||
Impearls | ||
NGC3132 © |
Beauty is truth, truth beauty,
— that is all Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know. Keats
E = M
Energy is eternal delight.
|
What wailing wight
© Copyright 2002 – 2009
|
Impearls: 2005-06-26 Archive Earthdate 2005-06-29
Flypaper Strategy II
Leftist “antiwar” commenters replying to the Cold Fury posting noted in an update to Impearls' earlier piece on this subject, deserve a more extensive response in my view than the fisking they got from that blog's regulars (good though that was), so we'll consider the matter more fully here.
Cold Fury's commenter in his turn doesn't address David Warren's point that “they [the terrorists] sooner or later get themselves killed.” How much experience will the Madrid train bombing suspect who, as the BBC article I linked to reported, recently blew himself up in a suicide bombing in Iraq, carry back to use elsewhere? And that's now typical for the terrorists (aka “Al Qaeda in Iraq,” as they themselves call themselves). Half a year ago the insurgents could attack the Iraqi Police in places like Mosul, and the police would flee in disorder. Now the IP stand their ground, while those trying to attack them are captured and massacred in large numbers. Attacking Coalition troops is even worse for the jihadists' overall longevity. Terrorists are reduced to basically launching suicide bombing attacks on helpless civilians. Coalition troops, on the other hand, are learning and will return with vast experience in coping with them.
The canard that there was no Iraqi gratitude as a result of their liberation following the Saddam Hussein regime's overthrow is latter-day leftist mythologizing, as Christopher Hitchens recently emphasized from his own direct personal experience in Iraq. Moreover, as Iraqi physician and blogger Ali Fadhil states in the very masthead of his blog Free Iraqi: “I was not living before the 9th of April and now I am, so let me speak!” Yep, no gratitude to be found there! “juaniflaco” would also have us believe that terrorists keep cropping up like the chopped-off heads of Hercules' Hydra — parroting the leftist line that there's no point in killing terrorists in wholesale numbers as the Iraqi and Coalition forces are doing (i.e., we might as well just give up), 'cause “for every one they kill there are 3 more to take their place.” Nonsense! There is an end to how many jihadists can flock to Iraq, and the Coalition and free Iraqis can simply keep killing them as long as they do. Meanwhile, as David Warren perceptively pointed out, the terrorists are not attacking America at home while they're inspired to take the fight to Iraq. Beyond that, as tubino separately commented:
Answer: yes. But he continues, asserting without evidence:
tubino carefully tries to obfuscate the fact that Iraq and Iraqis still have no history of suicide bombing — as essentially all the suicide bombers, according to reports I've seen, are not Iraqis at all, but foreign jihadists who've come into the country to fight the “Great Satan” over there. But tubino goes on to ask (as if he thinks he knows the answer):
Yes, there is polling data on how Iraqis feel about the Coalition's presence, and guess what: they want us (the Coalition) to stay. As Omar Fadhil at Iraqi blog Iraq the Model reported here back in May, 2005, “Al-Sabah [newspaper] is conducting a new opinion poll and till no[w] 1590 people have said their opinion about this question: What is the task Jafari's government has to handle first?” Selected findings:
Thus, Iraqis overwhelmingly oppose the Coalition's presence in their country… not! On the contrary, the conclusion is inescapable that while the presence of Coalition forces is certainly exciting to foreign jihadists, it's not particularly upsetting to the Iraqis themselves. Beyond that, the idea that Iraq's “occupation by a foreign power,” as tubino puts it, is the primary motivator for the foreign jihadists I believe is wrong (some leftists even like to pretend that the prison camp at Guantanamo is the major draw for terrorists, which is utterly insane). For those who tend toward this opinion, let me posit this question: what do you suppose is likelier to inspire and draw out terrorists from their hidey-holes throughout the Middle East and world, a huge spectacular victory for their side (the “stronger horse,” as Bin Laden put it) such as thousands of Americans (little demonic representatives of the Great Satan) getting immolated alive on world television, as occurred on September 11, 2001 — or the symbol of terrorist defeat, in Afghanistan, in Iraq, such as Guantanamo and the Coalition's presence in those countries represent? I submit that the twin towers of the World Trade Center collapsing in flames, while tiny figures hurl themselves in despair and horror off into space, was and is the greatest recruiting tool for jihadists imaginable.
The future potentiality of that, and worse, is what fighting the terrorists in Iraq and beyond is intended to foreclose.
UPDATE: 2005-06-30 03:15 UT: Omar at Iraq the Model blog also reports on perhaps a more significant Iraqi poll:
Omar goes on:
Impearls: 2005-06-26 Archive Earthdate 2005-06-22
BBC World confirms the Flypaper Strategy
It was Canadian essayist David Warren who in 2003 originated the concept of the so-called “Flypaper” strategy with regard to the war in Iraq. As Warren wrote in his first essay on the subject:
Nothing that has occurred since in Iraq and elsewhere has invalidated the fundamental correctness of this doctrine. Warren himself has written considerably further on this topic, most recently during this last month here, where he says:
Many other analysts have commented on this strategy, most recently James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal's editorial OpinionJournal page, where he runs a daily feature the “Best of the Web Today.” Yesterday, in a piece called “Red on Red,” Taranto notes a report from that day's New York Times revealing that insurgents in Iraq are now fighting each other as some local Iraqis, otherwise opponents of the Coalition's presence in the country, seek to forestall the imported foreign jihadists' proclivities towards blowing up Iraqis right and left in their campaign to prevent the newly installed elected Iraqi government from consolidating its hold on power and completing work on the new democratic Iraqi constitution. As Taranto says, “it would seem to vindicate both Vice President Cheney's much-maligned view that the indigenous insurgency is in its ‘final throes’ and the ‘flypaper’ theory that liberating Iraq is drawing in terrorists and forcing them to face the U.S. military.” In this regard, a report from the BBC just a week ago thoroughly reinforces this point of view. While the BBC has been almost unremittingly negative with respect to the war on terror, including its Iraqi theater, even a stopped clock gets it right occasionally, and the BBC now and then does partially make up for its “sins.” On June 15, 2005, BBC World broadcast a remarkable story (carried in the U.S. by PBS outlets) illustrating how fighting the terrorists in Iraq is making both America and Europe safer. They reported, “Police in Spain say they've arrested sixteen suspected Islamic militants in raids across the country. Eleven of them are said to be linked to Abu Musab al-Zarkawi, the leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq.”As BBC Security Correspondent Frank Gardner (who was crippled a year ago incidentally by gunmen in Saudi Arabia) narrates:
A BBC interviewee, Jeremy Binnie of Jane's Terrorism and Insurgency Centre, put it thusly: The war in Iraq has minimized the threat to Europe [emphasis added] because everyone who's Jihad-inclined wants to go fight over there. So even though some of these… the guys suspected of involvement in the train bombings have reportedly gone over to lodge themselves in Iraq. So there are these radicals sort of coming out of Europe and actually going to a different theater altogether. Gardner concludes his report, noting: “Spain has seen terror-related arrests like these before, but despite early claims by the authorities, insufficient evidence has often seen them result in embarrassing acquittals.” As one might expect from the BBC, the written report at their web site concerning this incident has been sanitized of all such stuff as “The war in Iraq has minimized the threat to Europe.” However, the report does include some other very interesting tidbits, to wit:
Thus, the importance of the war in Iraq for keeping terrorists at bay from the centers of civilization. The BBC broadcast piece shows how the “flypaper strategy” for attracting terrorists to Iraq is working. Instead of subverting European countries or attacking America, potentially at the cost of thousands of civilian casualties as we've seen before, jihadists are flocking to Iraq, where our military can kill them in detail. It's also worth observing how the suicide bombers we hear about every day in the news from Iraq are actually arriving from abroad.
From the reports I've seen, essentially none of the fanatics willing to blow themselves up taking many Iraqis along with them are Iraqis themselves.
So much for the idea that it's primarily the Iraqis who hate Americans and the Coalition and want us out; rather it's radical Islamofascist foreigners from around the world who are desperate to prevent Iraqis from taking destiny in their own hands to establish a modern, decent democratic society in the heart of the Muslim world.
UPDATE — Follow-up article:
2005-06-29 17:50 UT:
A follow-up article to the original posting above, entitled
“Flypaper Strategy II,”
has been posted.
UPDATE — Reader's Write: 2005-06-26 17:30 UT: A number of readers sent in their comments:
Good point. Here's another letter:
Thanks for your reply, Patrick. Your appreciation really should go to David Warren, however, rather than to me, as he's the one who originated the “Flypaper” concept. I agree that his idea also chimes pretty well with my own thoughts on this issue. I think TigerHawk's article that Glenn Reynolds linked to in that same posting as he did to mine is also quite significant in this regard. I've always thought that Iraq's placement next to Saudi Arabia, as well as Iran, was a factor in the selection of Iraq as the next target after Afghanistan. Not only would holding Iraq give the U.S. a much larger and broader footprint than Kuwait in its border against Saudi Arabia, but Iraq's oil producing capability (once ramped up adequately after the war) would help shield the developed world against too great a shock (which otherwise might cause collapse of the world economy) in case Saudi Arabia were to cut off oil supplies in a new boycott of the West as a result of too much pressure being placed on it to reform its terrorist-abetting ways. And another letter along the same lines:
This reader, on the other hand, finds the article an occasion for mirth:
Always glad to provide comic relief to the readers of Impearls.
UPDATE — Links to the piece: 2005-06-23 15:00 UT: Glenn Reynolds the Instapundit linked to this article, with the comment, “the ‘Flypaper Strategy’ is getting strange new respect.” The posting by TigerHawk that he links to in the same posting is very much worth perusing in this connection as well. Winds of Change links to the article twice: once (by Colt) in the “Thursday Winds of War” section, and again in a piece by Bill Roggio specifically about Iraq called “Training Grounds, Magnets, and Hunters in Iraq,” commenting: “Michael McNeil from Impearls cites an unlikely source for confirmation of the Flypaper/Magnet theory: the BBC. Not only has Iraq become a magnet, but it has increased Europe's security by redirecting fighters from their European soil. Marc at
USS Neverdock
also
linked to
the piece, noting
“It's been said many times that the war in Iraq makes Europe and America safer.
The flypaper strategy is proof of that.”
UPDATE — Links to the piece: 2005-06-29 17:45 UT: Many more blogs have linked to this article: Cold Fury in a posting amusingly but aptly titled “Snatching victory from the jaws of Democrats,” quotes David Warren and links to this article, commenting: “Warren as usual is perfectly correct, and all the handwringing defeatism the Democrats and their Old Media poodles can possibly muster won't change it. (Via Michael McNeil — and this is a fine post as well, btw, and well worth your time if you haven't seen it yet — and Insty.)” Cold Fury has an active comments section, with leftists reacting to the article with their usual hyperbolic outrage, and the blog's regulars coolly taking them on. I'll reply to some of the leftist points in comments to the Cold Fury piece in a separate posting. The Happy Carpenter, in a piece called “The "Fly Paper" strategy, vindicated,” links to the article, commenting: “Well, duh, of course it's working. How could it not?” Russ Mitchell at Boxing Alcibiades, in a posting entitled “Flypaper for asshats…,” writes: “Over at Impearls, an interesting article: BBC confirms the flypaper strategy. This has long been suspected, of course. It's what the soldiers speak of when they talk about how it's better to play “an away game” than a “home game.” Clayton Cramer at his blog, in a posting titled “The Flypaper Strategy,” writes:
“Ace” at Ace of Spades HQ, in an article called “Flypaper Revisited: Even the BBC Acknowledges The War In Iraq Has Made Europe Safer,” links to my piece and quotes from the BBC broadcast, calling it “stunning.” He goes on to say:
“Winds of Change” in The Command Post, in its “Thursday Winds of War” column, passes along the earlier mention from Winds of Change, noted here before. “Firehand” in his Irons in the Fire blog, in a piece called “All you need to know about Gitmo,” links to a column by James Lileks on that subject, and also to this article, noting: “And an interesting bit on the ‘flypaper strategy’ and how, among other things, it's been saving a lot of Europeans from themselves, here.” Brad Lips at the Lips Brothers, in a piece called “The Iraq Project,” links to this article, writing: “When I put my finger to the wind, even among conservatives, there seems to be a growing exhaustion over Iraq. I'm still very pleased with how well things have gone. Is this stubborn clinging to a position, or (as I like to think) having a sense of perspective about the inherent challenges and costs of war that a lot of other observors lack? All I know for sure is that this post about the ‘Flypaper’ strategy of bringing war to Iraq resonates with me as mostly true.” “antimedia” writing in Media Lies, in a lengthy piece called ‘Rethinking the Downing Street memo,” links to this article in an update at the end, noting: “For a different point of view on the strategy behind the war, read about the ‘flypaper strategy.’ I confess, I wasn't aware of David Warren's essays, but I've written essentially the same thing before myself.” “Mr. B” in New Optimates, in a posting titled “What's the most efficient way to kill lots of flies?,” answers his own question (and links to this article) presenting the solution, “Lay down some flypaper….” Pierre Legrand, in Papa Doc's Pink Flamingo Bar & Grill blog, posts a piece mainly about an Ann Coulter article entitled “Coulter gives out some much needed perspective on Gitmo,” ending it with a link to this article, writing:
The latter New York Times article that Legrand points to illustrates yet another instance where a Muslim conspiracy in a Western country (Britain in this case) maintains links and provides support (including yet another suicide bomber connection) with the jihadists in Iraq. Jay Fitzgerald at Hub Blog, on the other hand, in a posting entitled “Stabilization vs. Fly-trap, Part II” (he'd earlier written about the subject here, in a posting criticizing Austin Bay for having the temerity to mention the “Flypaper” theory), follows up on his previous piece with a link to this article, writing:
Impearls: 2005-06-26 Archive Earthdate 2005-06-20
Map of Mars
While on the subject of Mars (see the next posting for that earlier piece), above is a strikingly beautiful, relatively recent (from a few years ago) map of the Red Planet, that I suspect few people have as yet encountered, derived from the Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft's MOLA (Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter) instrument, which for the first time puts together a detailed look at how the elevations of the terrain on Mars stack up with respect to each other. The color-coding legend shown at the top of the map extends from −8 kilometers (−5 miles) below the standard “datum” to +8 km above that level, while latitude and longitude on the map proper are indicated in 5° increments for the Mercator projection portion, and 10° for the polar projections (left one is south, right for north). Click on the map to link to a larger version at NASA with surface elements labeled (I like it better without the labeling, frankly). See also this link to the NASA “MOLA” homepage, and this one for the MOLA Image Gallery. On the Image Gallery page, don't miss the large scale maps, particularly here (at 1,080 × 620 pixels), and here — for 12,032 × 6,912 pixels (careful, it's a 17.6 MB file!). Using the MOLA data, researchers can now discern, for instance, how the descending altitude of apparent streambed valleys really could have conducted water down their courses back during warmer-wetter days on Mars; and it's also possible to compute how three-quarters of the martian terrain during such earlier times would have drained down to the “northern lowlands” (purple-blue along the top portion of the map), where oceans — if ever there were any on Mars, as seems increasingly likely — would have resided. Taking inspiration from Edgar Rice Burroughs' “John Carter of Mars” stories of our youth, those northern lowlands (plus the enormous impact basin in the southern hemisphere known as Hellas) would have constituted the martian “dead sea bottoms” of yore and lore!
Also, for illustrative purposes, below is a view of our own planet using a similar altitude-coding representation (not precisely the same altitude scale). Notice how Antarctica appears red, not due to some weird false-color rendering of its coldness, but because the continent is so high altitude-wise: it's covered by an average of 6,500 feet (2,000 meters) thickness of glacial ice. (Click on the map to link to John Walker's “Earth Screen Saver for Windows,” the source of the image.) Impearls: 2005-06-26 Archive Earthdate 2005-06-14
Shining Frozen Lake on Mars
© Copyright 2005
Nature Publishing Group,
reproduced by permission.
The latest Nature journal reveals a stunning image from the Mars Express spacecraft, presently orbiting Mars in a polar orbit, showing a frozen lake gleaming in the sun on the floor of a high latitude martian crater. As the piece says: 1
Reference
1 “Snapshot: Sunlight on an icy martian crater,” Nature, vol. 435, p. 723 (issue dated 2005-06-09); © copyright 2005 Nature Publishing Group, figure reproduced by permission.
|
2002-11-03 2002-11-10 2002-11-17 2002-11-24 2002-12-01 2002-12-08 2002-12-15 2002-12-22 2002-12-29 2003-01-05 2003-01-12 2003-01-19 2003-01-26 2003-02-02 2003-02-16 2003-04-20 2003-04-27 2003-05-04 2003-05-11 2003-06-01 2003-06-15 2003-06-22 2003-06-29 2003-07-13 2003-07-20 2003-08-03 2003-08-10 2003-08-24 2003-08-31 2003-09-07 2003-09-28 2003-10-05 2003-10-26 2003-11-02 2003-11-16 2003-11-23 2003-11-30 2003-12-07 2003-12-14 2003-12-21 2003-12-28 2004-01-04 2004-01-11 2004-01-25 2004-02-01 2004-02-08 2004-02-29 2004-03-07 2004-03-14 2004-03-21 2004-03-28 2004-04-04 2004-04-11 2004-04-18 2004-04-25 2004-05-02 2004-05-16 2004-05-23 2004-05-30 2004-06-06 2004-06-13 2004-06-20 2004-07-11 2004-07-18 2004-07-25 2004-08-22 2004-09-05 2004-10-10 2005-06-12 2005-06-19 2005-06-26 2005-07-03 2005-07-10 2005-07-24 2005-08-07 2005-08-21 2005-08-28 2005-09-04 2005-09-11 2005-09-18 2005-10-02 2005-10-09 2005-10-16 2005-10-30 2005-11-06 2005-11-27 2006-04-02 2006-04-09 2006-07-02 2006-07-23 2006-07-30 2007-01-21 2007-02-04 2007-04-22 2007-05-13 2007-06-17 2007-09-09 2007-09-16 2007-09-23 2007-10-07 2007-10-21 2007-11-04 2009-06-28 2009-07-19 2009-08-23 2009-09-06 2009-09-20 2009-12-13 2011-03-27 2012-01-01 2012-02-05 2012-02-12 |